the singularity of being and nothingness
Twinkle, Twinkle Little Deconstructed Star
So over the last year, I've become quite good at playing nursery rhymes on my guitar-it's one of the easist ways to be able to actually play guitar while concomitantly appeasing the attentions of my two-year old daughter. On my favorites (because it's easy) is the old-standby, Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star.
Well, this last Saturday night, I did not sleep a wink. Therefore, all Sunday was somewhat of a daze. However, somewhere in the midst of it, I was playing this song and was struck by the question posed throughout: "How I wonder what you are." Indeed, I thought, how we do wonder what stars are.
Of course, science tells us that they are giant balls of coalesced stellar gases. Pa-shaw. Here's my philosophical analysis.
Twinkle, twinkle little star, how I wonder what you are
Up above the world so high, like a diamond in the sky
Twinkle, twinkle little star, how I wonder what you are
Are you really just a ball of gas, as the hegenomy of science says?
Why should I believe that, when no one's ever seen it, and no one's ever touched it
I know I've never tasted it; I've never had a side of star with turkey on rye
Maybe it's an animal; maybe just a great machine
It's harder to tell what's real, and separate the make-believe
Maybe it's a giant sheet the ancients spread across the sky
And the moderns came in with their sticks, and only poked holes in it…
That kind of makes sense to me, because I have some holes of my own
And you say, you say, you say I'm a star; or at least I'm made of it
So when I pierced full through, with Western epistemology
Maybe I can be one of your stars; reducible to bare phenomenology
And you say, you say, you say I'm a star; you say, you say, you say I'm a star…
| Print article | This entry was posted by existdissolve on May 19, 2008 at 9:21 am, and is filed under Philosophy. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |