the singularity of being and nothingness
Twinkle, Twinkle Little Deconstructed Star
So over the last year, I've become quite good at playing nursery rhymes on my guitar–it's one of the easist ways to be able to actually play guitar while concomitantly appeasing the attentions of my two-year old daughter. On my favorites (because it's easy) is the old-standby, Twinkle, Twinkle Little Star.
Well, this last Saturday night, I did not sleep a wink. Therefore, all Sunday was somewhat of a daze. However, somewhere in the midst of it, I was playing this song and was struck by the question posed throughout: "How I wonder what you are." Indeed, I thought, how we do wonder what stars are.
Of course, science tells us that they are giant balls of coalesced stellar gases. Pa-shaw. Here's my philosophical analysis.
Twinkle, twinkle little star, how I wonder what you are
Up above the world so high, like a diamond in the sky
Twinkle, twinkle little star, how I wonder what you are
Are you really just a ball of gas, as the hegenomy of science says?
Why should I believe that, when no one's ever seen it, and no one's ever touched it
I know I've never tasted it; I've never had a side of star with turkey on rye
Maybe it's an animal; maybe just a great machine
It's harder to tell what's real, and separate the make-believe
Maybe it's a giant sheet the ancients spread across the sky
And the moderns came in with their sticks, and only poked holes in it…
That kind of makes sense to me, because I have some holes of my own
And you say, you say, you say I'm a star; or at least I'm made of it
So when I pierced full through, with Western epistemology
Maybe I can be one of your stars; reducible to bare phenomenology
And you say, you say, you say I'm a star; you say, you say, you say I'm a star…
Print article | This entry was posted by existdissolve on May 19, 2008 at 9:21 am, and is filed under Philosophy. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |