the singularity of being and nothingness
Book Review: Brian Greene's "Fabric of the Cosmos: Space, Time and the Texture of Reality"
A quasi-sequel to his "Elegant Universe," Fabric is an intriguing foray into the wild and wonderful world of quantum mechanics and speculative physics. Prima facie, the subject matter would appear to be significantly beyond the interests and capacities of the general, non-specialized public. However, Greene does an exceptional job of distilling the relevant issues of the content into managable, comprehensible and–most importantly–interesting reading.
As in Elegant Universe, Greene briefly traces the historical developments which have laid the foundations for the revolutions of quantum physics in the twentieth century. To do this, he examines "classical" conceptions of space and time, showing how very fundamental beliefs about the nature of these realities are being challenged and overturned by rapid discoveries in the field of quantum physics. With this established, Greene moves onto to discuss cosmic origins. Of particular interest is Greene's in-depth critique of deficiencies in the standard big-bang model. After discussing these issues at length, Greene proceeds to apply considerations of quantum physics to propose a new model of origins, the inflationary model.
After dispensing with considerations of origins, Greene brings the previous discussions to bear on one of his particular interests, String Theory. To Greene, String Theory encapsulates one of modern physics' best chances at providing a "theory of everything," a single, unified theory that will apply and extend to all physical phenemenon in the universe.
Finally, Greene concludes by using quantum physics and String Theory to speculate about the stuff of science-fiction: time travel and teleportation. Although he is careful to note that his discussion is merely speculative, it is clear that the ideas contained within the vision of quantum physics which Greene has outlined provide, at the very least, a theoretical basis for realistically speculating about the ability to pursue such fanciful ideas in the future.
At around 500 pages, Fabric of the Cosmos is both comprehensive and accessible. Greene's writing is not spectacular, but it is engaging and easy to follow, making the complex ideas much simpler to imagine and process. The biggest success in this book, I believe, is that Greene brings the reader into the world of quantum physics and String Theory. Given the complexity of the ideas involved, it would be easy for the author to either speak completely past his audience, or to distill the ideas to such a simplistic level as to offend. However, Greene successfully walks this thin line, creating an accessible world while concomitantly inviting the reader to engage the ideas beyond the level of mere metaphor. On the whole, this was quite an enjoyable book to read. While challenging at points, the content seduces the reader into the wild and wonderful world of quantum physics, a world–a universe–in which the impossible is possible, in which the absurd is the very fabric of which the universe is composed.
Endnote: For a compelling audio-visual version of the ideas contained in this book, head to http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/nova/elegant/program.html to see a PBS special entitled "The Elegant Universe" which is based upon Greene's first book of the same name. All 3 hours are available to watch online for free, and are well worth the time to watch.
Print article | This entry was posted by existdissolve on June 17, 2007 at 12:06 pm, and is filed under Books. Follow any responses to this post through RSS 2.0. You can leave a response or trackback from your own site. |
about -1917 years ago
Exist,
Ever heard of Replacement theology(it teaches that the church has permenently replaced Israel)
-Scribe
about -1917 years ago
Yeah, I am aware of this theological paradigm. What of it?
about -1917 years ago
I have preterist trying to convince me via email that the church has replaced Israel thus the church receives all the blessings and tIsrael all of the cursings..
btw I humorously read your comment in an english dialect-must be it’s juxtaposition.
about -1917 years ago
I have preterist trying to convince me via email that the church has replaced Israel thus the church receives all the blessings and tIsrael all of the cursings..
Given the way you have raised this issue, I assume you are opposed to the preterist view (obviously, since another is trying to convince of its veracity) and that, conversely, you interpret the references to “Israel” in the apocalyptic work of Revelation (and in Paul’s eschatological content) as the political/ethnic nation of Israel. Have I identified these emphases correctly?
I am curious: what are the lines of your interlocutor’s argument?
And another: if what I have outlined above is correct, do you feel that the political nation of modern day “Israel” is correlative to the “Israel” which is the subject of your interpretation of the prophetic material?
btw I humorously read your comment in an english dialect-must be it’s juxtaposition.
LoL! I would suggest continuing to do that. Although I am not English, I can imagine reading my writing in an English accent could make for some interesting times…!
about -1917 years ago
We’ll do the “preterist, futuriist thing” in the..well..FUTURE!(too tired now must go al trabajo manana-2 work tomorrow)
“LoL! I would suggest continuing to do that. Although I am not English, I can imagine reading my writing in an English accent could make for some interesting times…! ”
* A loyal lackey of Exist promulgates from the kings lattice” Cursed is any man who speaketh not the king’s(Exist) english!! Cursed is the man who doth not seek the singularity…his house shall be made an dunghill, and thus shall he be banished from the kingdom forthwith!!! We will not adhere to your belly aching and will no longer suffer the parlance of slack-jawed idiots-that is all, godspeed to all.”
Yep, I’m about done…
-Scribe
about -1917 years ago
A loyal lackey of Exist promulgates from the kings lattice” Cursed is any man who speaketh not the king’s(Exist) english!! Cursed is the man who doth not seek the singularity…his house shall be made an dunghill, and thus shall he be banished from the kingdom forthwith!!! We will not adhere to your belly aching and will no longer suffer the parlance of slack-jawed idiots-that is all, godspeed to all.”
That’s awesome! Well done!
about -1917 years ago
I finally got a chance to read this post… and now I’m wondering, what are some of the aspects of the inflationary model? What are the deficiencies of the “big bang” theory? I think I’m right in saying that Hawking doesn’t like the big bang model anymore either, but I may be off. Anyway, I’m wondering of course in connection to theology and creation and what not since I am strictly a young earth 7 day creationist…
Second, it’s interesting isn’t it that our world is so complicated that even when we think we have it all figured out, we don’t. I’m reminded of this a lot visiting parishoneers and awaiting medical diagnoses. With the modern technology we have, there is still much that remains a mystery.
about -1917 years ago
mofast-
The main problem that many contemporary cosmologists have with the standard big-bang model is not its descriptive veracity, per say. Rather, the issue is more of a theoretical one. As far as observation is concerned, the big bang model provides a pretty good picture of the macro issues of the early development of the universe. The place where it fails is in the incorporation of quantum physics and string theory. You’ll have to forgive me for not being able to explicate precisely what these problems are.
The inflationary model, then, is a new way of thinking of the earliest moments of the devleopment of the universe which accounts for theoretical work which has been done in quantum physics and string theory. What this model basically does is makes intelligible how similarities and changes in the quantum state of various areas of the universe can exist in relation to one another.
In essence, the inflationary model does not really replace or do away with the big-bang model. Rather, it is a supplement, a “before-the-big-bang” addition that accounts for the quantum issues at play and then allows the standard model to provide later, macro descriptions of the universe’s development and evolution.
Anyway, I’m wondering of course in connection to theology and creation and what not since I am strictly a young earth 7 day creationist…
LoL, that’s funny!
Second, it’s interesting isn’t it that our world is so complicated that even when we think we have it all figured out, we don’t. I’m reminded of this a lot visiting parishoneers and awaiting medical diagnoses. With the modern technology we have, there is still much that remains a mystery.
You’re definitely right, and Greene would agree with you also. Although he has great hopes for the abilities of string theory to provide a “theory of everything,” he recognizes the immense limitations which currently exist and suspects that the answer will not come anywhere near within his lifetime.
about -1917 years ago
mofast–
I would like to offer a bit fuller of an explanation that my hastily thrown-together previous post did not accomodate.
One of the problems of the “standard model” of big-bang cosmology is called the “horizon problem.” In a nutshell, the questions how regions of space separated by billions of lightyears of space/time can have nearly identical properties (like temperate, general quantum activity, etc.). The reason this is an issue in the standard model is because one has to posit that the universe has expanded at the same rate of speed (that of light) from the present, backwards to “the beginning.” Apparently, the mathematics involved seem to indicate that the rate of expansion and the present distances involved cannnot accomodate such a linear conception of origin.
What the inflationary model suggests is that there was a brief period of time (a fraction of a billionth of a second) in which the universe expanded an inordiante amount at greater than the speed of light, stretching spacetime in a uniform manner into which the constituent bits of matter then expanded at a constant rate: enter the standard model. However, as it was the universe (space/time) itself which was expanding, and not merely matter moving through space/time, the inflationary model provides a compelling way of unifying the findings of quantum physics without violating the laws of special relativity. After all, if it is space/time itself which is expanding, to speak of violation of the speed of light (which only applies to objects moving through space/time) becomes a non-issue. Therefore, as I pointed out before, the inflaitonary model is like a “prequel” to the standard model, providing the framework and backdrop for the story that unfolds in the big bang.
about -1917 years ago
Um, how about putting up the all-flash website. We’re waiting
about -1917 years ago
quiet, you.